CA Inter Auditing & Ethics – Chapter 3 Notes (Part 1) Notes

CA Intermediate Auditing Chapter 3 notes on audit documentation and audit evidence with illustrations of people examining documents and charts.

CA Inter Auditing & Ethics – Chapter 3 Notes (Part 1)

SA 530 – Audit Sampling (Concepts, Meaning, Population & Sampling Approaches)


SA 530 – Audit Sampling

Meaning of Audit Sampling

Definition (ICAI)

Audit Sampling means applying audit procedures to less than 100% of items in a population so that every sampling unit has an equal chance of selection, enabling the auditor to draw conclusions about the entire population.

Objective

To provide a reasonable basis for drawing conclusions about the population without checking every transaction.


Why is Audit Sampling Used?

Earlier auditors checked every transaction.

Today, due to:

  • Effective Internal Controls
  • Huge volume of transactions
  • Time constraints
  • Cost considerations

auditors perform sample checking instead of checking every transaction.

Benefits

  • Saves time
  • Reduces audit cost
  • Efficient
  • Scientifically reliable (when statistical sampling is used)
  • Still provides sufficient audit evidence

Scope of SA 530

Applicable when auditor decides to use sampling while performing audit procedures.

It covers:

  • Statistical Sampling
  • Non-statistical Sampling
  • Sample Design
  • Sample Selection
  • Sample Evaluation
  • Sampling Risk

It complements SA 500 – Audit Evidence.


Important Definitions

Population

Entire set of data from which sample is selected.

Example:

Trade Receivables = ₹5 crore

Entire receivable ledger = Population.


Sampling Unit

Individual item selected from the population.

Example

Population → 5,000 Sales Invoices

Sampling Unit → Invoice No. 4523


Relationship

Population
Sampling Units
Sample Selected
Audit Procedures
Conclusion
Applied to Whole Population

Characteristics of Population

The population should satisfy 3 conditions.


1. Appropriate

Population should be relevant to the audit objective.

Example

Testing Overstatement of Receivables

Population:

✔ Accounts Receivable Ledger

Testing Understatement of Payables

Population:

✔ Supplier Statements
✔ Unpaid Invoices

NOT Accounts Payable Ledger.


2. Complete

Population should contain all relevant items.

Incomplete population → Wrong conclusion.

Example

Testing sales for whole year

Population should include sales from April to March, not only April–December.


3. Reliable

Population should be:

  • Accurate
  • Complete
  • From reliable source

Otherwise sample becomes unreliable.


Exam Mnemonic

Population = A C R

A → Appropriate

C → Complete

R → Reliable


Representative Sample

Sample selected must represent the characteristics of the whole population.

Representative sample ensures:

  • Fair conclusion
  • Less bias
  • Reliable audit opinion

Types (Approaches) of Sampling

Two approaches:

Audit Sampling
┌────┴────┐
│ │
Statistical Non-statistical
Sampling Sampling

Statistical Sampling

Meaning

A sampling approach involving:

  • Random selection
  • Probability theory
  • Measurement of sampling risk

It is scientific and objective.


Characteristics

✔ Random Selection

✔ Mathematical Method

✔ Probability Theory

✔ Sampling Risk Measured

✔ No Auditor Bias


Advantages

  • Scientific
  • Objective
  • Reliable
  • Less personal bias
  • Better for large organisations
  • Suitable for huge transactions

Examples

  • Trade Receivable Confirmation
  • Payroll Audit
  • Purchase Verification
  • Invoice Testing
  • Petty Cash Checking

Non-Statistical Sampling

Meaning

Sample selected using:

  • Auditor’s experience
  • Professional judgement
  • Personal knowledge

No probability theory involved.


Examples

Checking:

  • Highest value invoices
  • March transactions
  • Year-end transactions
  • Top 20 customers

Advantages

  • Easy
  • Flexible
  • Less complicated
  • Suitable for small audits

Disadvantages

  • Personal bias
  • Not scientific
  • Sampling risk cannot be measured
  • Less reliable than statistical sampling

Comparison

BasisStatistical SamplingNon-Statistical Sampling
SelectionRandomAuditor Judgment
ScientificYesNo
Probability TheoryYesNo
Personal BiasNilPossible
ReliabilityHighModerate
Suitable forLarge AuditsSmall Audits

Sampling vs Traditional Audit

Traditional AuditAudit Sampling
Checks 100% transactionsChecks selected items
Time consumingTime saving
CostlyEconomical
Less efficientMore efficient
Suitable for small populationSuitable for large population

Factors Affecting Extent of Sampling

Auditor considers:

  1. Size of organisation
  2. Internal control system
  3. Reliability of records
  4. Tolerable error
  5. Desired confidence level

CA Exam Keywords ⭐

  • Audit Sampling
  • Population
  • Sampling Unit
  • Representative Sample
  • Statistical Sampling
  • Non-statistical Sampling
  • Random Selection
  • Probability Theory
  • Professional Judgment
  • Sampling Risk
  • Tolerable Error
  • Desired Confidence Level

One-Page Revision Sheet

SA 530 – Audit Sampling
Purpose
Check Less than 100%
Draw Conclusion on Population
Population
Appropriate
Complete
Reliable
Sampling Unit
Individual Item
Approaches
1. Statistical
• Random
• Scientific
• Probability
• No Bias
2. Non-statistical
• Auditor Judgment
• Experience
• Simple
• Personal Bias
Representative Sample
Reliable Audit Opinion
Mnemonic:
Population = ACR
(A) Appropriate
(C) Complete
(R) Reliable

This completes Part 1 of the notes on SA 530 – Audit Sampling (Concepts & Sampling Approaches).

Leave a comment