Administrative Law – Exam-Oriented Notes
1. Meaning of Administrative Law
Administrative Law is the branch of public law that regulates the powers, functions, duties and control of administrative authorities (executive agencies).
Definitions
Kenneth Culp Davis
- Law concerning powers and procedures of administrative agencies.
- Includes judicial review of administrative action.
A.V. Dicey
- Determines legal status and liabilities of state officials.
- Defines rights and liabilities of citizens in dealings with public officials.
Ivor Jennings
- Administrative law is the law relating to administration.
- Deals with organization, powers and duties of administrative authorities.
Nature
- Subset of Public Law.
- Controls executive action.
- Ensures fairness and legality in administration.
- Developed with the rise of the Welfare State.
2. Need for Administrative Law
Reasons
- Growth of Welfare State.
- Increasing functions of government.
- Technical and complex legislation.
- Need for quick decisions.
- Delegation of legislative powers.
- Protection of citizens from misuse of administrative powers.
Objectives
- Maintain balance between individual liberty and state control.
- Prevent administrative despotism.
- Ensure legality, reasonableness and fairness.
3. Sources of Administrative Law
(A) Constitution of India
- Primary source.
- Article 73 – Executive power of Union.
- Article 162 – Executive power of States.
- Provides for tribunals, public corporations and government liability.
(B) Acts/Statutes
Examples:
- Companies Act, 2013
- SEBI Act, 1992
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(C) Ordinances, Notifications, Circulars & Administrative Directions
Examples:
- Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013
- Minimum Wages Notifications.
(D) Judicial Decisions
- Courts interpret administrative powers.
- Article 141: Law declared by Supreme Court is binding on all courts.
4. Rule of Law
Developed by
A.V. Dicey
Meaning
Government should be governed by law and not by arbitrary power.
Three Principles
1. Supremacy of Law
- No arbitrary power.
- Government actions must have legal authority.
2. Equality Before Law
- Everyone is equal before ordinary courts.
- No special privileges.
3. Predominance of Legal Spirit
- Rights protected through courts and judicial precedents.
Rule of Law in India
Constitutional Basis
Preamble
- Justice
- Liberty
- Equality
- Dignity
Fundamental Rights (Part III)
- Check arbitrary action.
Directive Principles (Part IV)
- Guide welfare legislation.
Important Cases
State of M.P. v. Thakur Bharat Singh (1967)
- Executive action affecting citizens must have legislative authority.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
- Rule of Law is part of Basic Structure of Constitution.
5. Administrative Discretion
Meaning
Freedom of administrative authority to choose among alternatives according to reason and justice.
Importance
- Flexibility.
- Technical decision-making.
- Quick administration.
Example
RTO granting driving licence after driving test.
Limitation
Discretion should not be:
- Arbitrary
- Vague
- Capricious
- Mala fide
6. Judicial Review
Meaning
Power of courts to examine legality of legislative and executive actions.
Purpose
- Prevent abuse of power.
- Ensure constitutional compliance.
Constitutional Basis
- Articles 13, 245, 246
- Articles 32 and 226
Features
- Reviews decision-making process, not merits of decision.
- Declares ultra vires acts void.
Important Cases
Airport Authority of India v. Centre for Aviation Policy (2022)
- Courts generally do not interfere in policy decisions unless arbitrary or mala fide.
S. Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab (1964)
- Judicial review available for abuse or mala fide exercise of power.
Hind Construction v. Workmen (1965)
- Punishment can be struck down if shockingly disproportionate.
7. Stages of Judicial Review
(A) At Delegation Stage
Court checks whether discretion delegated is constitutional.
Administrative Discretion & Article 14
Article 14 prohibits arbitrary discretion.
Case:
State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali (1952)
- Excessive and unguided discretion violates Article 14.
(B) Administrative Discretion & Article 19
Restrictions on freedoms must be reasonable.
Cases
Dr. Ram Manohar v. State of Delhi (1950)
- Externment powers upheld because safeguards existed.
Hari v. Deputy Commissioner of Police (1956)
- Valid due to hearing and appeal rights.
H.R. Banthis v. Union of India (1979)
- Licensing provisions struck down due to vague criteria.
8. Abuse of Administrative Discretion
Grounds
- Mala Fides (Bad Faith)
- Irrelevant Considerations
- Ignoring Relevant Considerations
- Arbitrary Orders
- Improper Purpose
- Colourable Exercise of Power
- Violation of Procedure/Natural Justice
- Excess of Jurisdiction
Case
Tata Cellular v. Union of India (1996)
- Government has freedom of choice but not for collateral purposes.
9. Non-Application of Mind
Occurs when authority fails to exercise discretion properly.
Forms
(a) Acting Under Dictation
Commissioner of Police v. Gordhandas Bhanji
- Decision invalid.
(b) Self-Restriction
- Rigid application of policy without considering facts.
(c) Mechanical Exercise of Power
- No independent application of mind.
10. Remedies Against Administrative Action
A. Constitutional Remedies
- Judicial Review under Articles 32 and 226.
B. Statutory Remedies
Statutory Appeals
Example:
- Competition Act → NCLAT → Supreme Court.
Reference to High Court
Example:
- Income Tax Act provisions.
C. Ordinary/Equitable Remedies
1. Injunction
Prohibitory Injunction
Stops wrongful acts.
Temporary Injunction
- During proceedings.
Perpetual Injunction
- Final relief.
Mandatory Injunction
- Compels performance of positive acts.
2. Declaratory Action
Court declares rights of parties.
3. Damages
Compensation for wrongful administrative acts.
11. Principles of Natural Justice
Meaning
Justice should not only be done but should also appear to be done.
Constitutional Basis
- Article 14
- Article 21
Main Principles
A. Rule Against Bias
(Nemo Judex in Causa Sua)
“No one should be a judge in his own cause.”
Types of Bias
1. Pecuniary Bias
Financial interest.
Case: J. Mohapatra v. State of Orissa (1984)
2. Personal Bias
Friendship, enmity, relationship.
Cases:
- Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar
- Manek Lal v. Prem Chand
3. Subject Matter Bias
Direct connection with dispute.
Includes:
- Departmental bias
- Pre-judgment
- Acting under dictation
B. Rule of Fair Hearing
(Audi Alteram Partem)
“Hear the other side.”
Components of Fair Hearing
1. Right to Notice
Notice must be:
- Proper
- Adequate
- Clear
- Reasonable
Case: Annamalai Cotton Mills v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
2. Right to Present Case & Evidence
3. Right to Rebut Adverse Evidence
Cross Examination
Case: S.C. Girotra v. UCO Bank
Legal Representation
Allowed where complexity exists.
Case: Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani
4. Disclosure of Evidence
All material relied upon must be disclosed.
5. Speaking Orders
Orders must contain reasons.
Cases
- Canara Bank v. Debasis Das
- Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
12. Exceptions to Natural Justice
- Statutory Exclusion
- Emergency Situations
- Interim Disciplinary Action
- Academic Evaluation
- Impracticability
Important Cases
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
- Post-decisional hearing permissible in emergencies.
Abhay Kumar v. K. Srinivasan
- Suspension/debarment can be interim.
P. Radhakrishna v. Osmania University
- Mass copying cases need not involve individual hearings.
13. Effect of Violation of Natural Justice
Void vs Voidable
Void
- Invalid from beginning (void ab initio).
Voidable
- Valid until set aside by court.
Case
Nawabkhan v. Gujarat (1974)
- Order passed without hearing and affecting fundamental rights is void ab initio.
14. Liability of Government
A. Contractual Liability
Article 299 Requirements
A valid government contract must:
- Be in name of President/Governor.
- Be in writing.
- Be executed by authorised person.
Important Point
- Non-compliance makes contract void.
Cases
Gujarat State Financial Corporation v. Lotus Hotels
- Mandamus may enforce contractual obligations.
Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P.
- State must act fairly even in contracts.
B. Quasi-Contractual Liability
Section 70, Indian Contract Act
Government must compensate if it enjoys benefits of lawful services supplied.
15. Tortious Liability of State
Tort
Civil wrong arising from breach of legal duty.
Vicarious Liability
State may be liable for wrongful acts of its servants.
Exceptions
- Judicial acts in good faith.
- Sovereign functions (limited protection).
Important Cases
Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar (1983)
- Compensation for illegal detention.
Bhim Singh v. State of J&K (1986)
- Compensation for unlawful arrest.
Saheli v. Commissioner of Police (1990)
- Compensation for police brutality.
Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta (1994)
- Compensation recoverable from erring public servant.
One-Day Revision Sheet
Dicey’s Rule of Law
- Supremacy of Law
- Equality Before Law
- Predominance of Legal Spirit
Natural Justice
- Nemo Judex in Causa Sua
- Audi Alteram Partem
- Speaking Order
Abuse of Discretion
- Mala fide
- Irrelevant considerations
- Improper purpose
- Arbitrary action
- Excess jurisdiction
Remedies
- Judicial Review
- Statutory Appeal
- Injunction
- Declaration
- Damages
Key Articles
- Art. 14 – Equality
- Art. 19 – Freedoms
- Art. 21 – Life & Liberty
- Art. 32 – Supreme Court Remedies
- Art. 226 – High Court Remedies
- Art. 299 – Government Contracts
- Art. 141 – Supreme Court law binding
These notes cover the major exam-oriented concepts, definitions, case laws, articles, and revision points from Lesson 4: Administrative Law.

Leave a comment